Schools in my area have been in session for about a month now, although the University classes just began. Along with the annual rituals of buying new clothes, supplies, and being terrified at the thought of your sweet 11-year old in middle-school, the annual homework debate is firing up.
Usually the homework debate is fought on simplistic terms, with one side arguing that it is good for students to practice what they learned in class, and the other side arguing that it is bad for them because it takes too much time away from family, friends, and play.
A recent analysis of data on mathematics test scores and homework published in
Econometrics Journal suggests that it might be good for some students, but bad for others. Specifically, the researchers found that high-achieving and low-acheiving students' math scores benefited significantly from having extra homework. However, the extra homework did not make much of a difference to average-achieving students' scores. Previous studies have found that all students benefit from having more homework, but the authors found that it was only beneficial to about 40% of the students they looked at.
"This does not mean that homework is unimportant for average achievers," says Daniel Henderson, one of the authors of the study. "But it does mean that this population may also benefit from other activities such as sports, art or music, rather than additional hours of math homework."
What are your thoughts on these findings? How should teachers interpret this for use in their classes? Would you assign homework to only those 40% or so who benefit from it?